Comparison · Updated September 2, 2026
RecordBeacon vs Redactable
Two redaction products built around different jobs. RecordBeacon is built for records work: whole response sets and email exports go in, a reviewer decides every mark, and the release refuses to run until every mark is decided. Redactable describes itself as AI redaction software for sensitive documents and images. This page compares the two row by row, using each company's own public pages.
No card. Run your worst scanned file through it yourself, or book a call and we run our sample set, or yours if your policy allows.
Different products, different centers of gravity.
RecordBeacon
RecordBeacon is redaction and review for records work, built around the release decision. Detection flags what it finds and stops. A reviewer approves or rejects every mark, and the release step refuses to run while anything is undecided. The redaction is burned into the released page, not drawn over it, and the release carries who decided what and when.
It reads scans, phone photos, and whole email exports with every attachment split into its own record, so nothing needs converting first.
Redactable
Redactable describes itself as AI redaction software that automatically detects and permanently redacts sensitive information from documents and images. Per their materials, uploads are PDF and image files, finalizing a document permanently removes content from the text, metadata, and OCR layer, and an activity log records every action on a document.
The comparison, row by row.
Six rows, each verifiable on a public page today. Rows we could not verify on both sides were left out rather than guessed at.
| Dimension | RecordBeacon | Redactable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and what each tier includes | The first fifteen documents are free, with no card, on flat monthly pricing with no per-page fees. Solo is $99 per month for one attorney. Firm is $349 per month with three reviewer seats, extra reviewer seats at $79 a month, and read-only seats that cost nothing. Dedicated is a single-tenant instance and starts with a conversation. | Per their pricing page, a free tier covers up to 3 documents, Starter is listed from $19 per month and Pro Plus from $79 per month depending on billing term, and Enterprise is a conversation with their team. Their help center says Starter supports a single user, with additional seats on other plans at $29.00 per user per month. Fifteen free documents against three, and on Firm the people who only need to see the work cost nothing. |
| Document and page limits | No per-page fees and no scanned-page allowance to count: it reads every page, rough scans included, on a flat monthly price. Single documents run up to 500 pages on Solo and 2,000 on Firm; Dedicated has no page ceiling. | Per their pricing page, every plan takes unlimited pages in a single document, and documents and scanned pages are metered monthly: Starter includes 15 documents and 20 scanned pages a month, Pro Plus 150 documents and 300 scanned pages a month. A scanned-heavy month here has no page allowance to run out. The only limit is the length of a single file, and Firm raises it while Dedicated removes it. |
| Review and approval | Nothing is redacted automatically: a reviewer approves or rejects every mark, and the release step refuses to run while anything is undecided. The reviewer can draw a box on anything detection missed, and reviewer-drawn marks carry the same audit record as detected ones. | Per their collaboration page, permissions are set per user on a project and control who can view documents, apply redactions, and finalize and export, with redactions routed for approval in draft mode. The gate here sits on the release itself. No page leaves until every individual mark has a decision with a name on it. |
| Email exports | Drop the whole export in. Each email and each attachment becomes its own record, duplicates across overlapping exports are caught once, and nothing needs converting first. | Their help center says redaction is supported for PDF files only, with instructions for converting Word, Excel, PowerPoint and email files to PDF before uploading. An email search that returns thousands of pages is a normal upload here, with no conversion step in front of it. |
| The release record | The release carries who decided what and when. Every decision is recorded by name, role-based access and a named audit trail sit behind it, and every released copy is read back to confirm the redacted content is gone. | Per their collaboration page, an activity log records who applied a redaction, who removed one, who commented, who finalized, and when, and version history captures the document's state at each stage. The record here starts at the decision: every approval and rejection is logged by name, and the released copy is checked before it goes out. That is the record that makes a release defensible a year later. |
| How government agencies buy | A clerk can run the first fifteen documents free, with no card, and see it work on a real response before involving anyone. An agency that needs its own single-tenant deployment, a security review and support through procurement is a scoped engagement, and we respond to RFPs. | Their local government page offers a free trial and a 30 minute meeting with one of their consultants, with a custom quote after the call. The evaluation starts on a real response with no card and no setup, and the procurement conversation starts when you are ready for it. |
Comparison verified against public information on September 2, 2026. Tell us if something is out of date: support@recordbeacon.com
Who RecordBeacon is for.
Choose RecordBeacon if
- Your responses arrive as email exports and mixed scans, and converting files before redacting is the part that eats the week.
- Your office has a mandatory review step, and you want the release itself to refuse to run while anything is undecided.
- You are a public agency that wants to see it work before anyone talks about contracts. The first fifteen documents are free, and we respond to RFPs.
Questions people actually ask
Is there a free Redactable alternative for government agencies?
RecordBeacon's first fifteen documents are free, with no card, which is enough to run a real response set rather than a sample. Redactable's free tier covers up to 3 documents, per their pricing page. Either way, the honest test is your own records: a scanned set, an email export, the file your staff complains about most.
Does Redactable have an approval workflow?
Per their collaboration page, yes: per-user permissions on each project, redactions routed for approval in draft mode, and a finalize step limited to people with the right permissions. RecordBeacon gates the release itself. A reviewer must approve or reject every individual mark, and the release step refuses to run while anything is undecided.
Can Redactable redact email exports?
Their help center says redaction is supported for PDF files only, with instructions for converting Word, Excel, PowerPoint and email files to PDF before uploading. RecordBeacon reads email exports directly: each email and each attachment becomes its own record, duplicates across overlapping exports are caught once, and nothing needs converting first.
How much does Redactable cost compared to RecordBeacon?
Redactable lists Starter from $19 per month and Pro Plus from $79 per month depending on billing term, with a free tier of 3 documents and enterprise pricing by contacting their team. RecordBeacon is $99 per month for Solo and $349 per month for Firm, on flat monthly pricing with no per-page fees, with the first fifteen documents free and a single-tenant Dedicated plan scoped per agency. For a records team, compare seat costs and what each plan's monthly limits cover for your set.
See it on records like yours.
Book twenty minutes and we run our sample set of scanned reports and email exports while you watch, or yours if your policy allows. Or start on your own: the first fifteen documents are free, with no card.
Comparing more than two tools? The evaluation guide has the questions to ask any vendor, including us. There is also a RecordBeacon vs CaseGuard page.